Excerpt
2024, Paper: "Conventional benefit-cost analysis is well-established and widely used to assess interventions designed to improve public health and welfare. While it has many advantages, it has well known limitations. Chief among these is its inattention to the distributional equity of the impacts. To measure individual wellbeing, the conventional approach relies on individuals’ willingness to exchange their own income for the outcomes they experience. To measure societal welfare, it relies on simple aggregation of these values across individuals. This approach reflects a relatively narrow conception of welfare and ignores how impacts are distributed across advantaged and disadvantaged individuals. Social welfare analysis has been proposed as an alternative approach to address these limitations, but real-world applications are rare due largely to the complexity of the calculations. This paper provides a pragmatic approach for conducting equity-sensitive benefit-cost analysis globally that addresses data limitations and other challenges, illustrated with example applications. It formally develops and implements equity weights that adjust for the decreasing marginal value of money and for additional moral considerations, prioritizing increases in welfare for those who are worse off."