����vlog����

All students must abide by all , including but not limited to the following:

• : In cases involving possible violations of the University-wide Statement on Rights and Responsibilities involving students from two or more Faculties or cases alleging that students from one Faculty have disrupted the performance of normal duties and activities within another Faculty, the President or their designee may, if an affected School or affected University-wide unit so requests, initiate an investigation concerning the incident, and the University Committee on Rights and Responsibilities (UCRR) may conduct an investigation and find facts, as part of the UCRR's authority to coordinate fact-finding in such cases, reserving to the relevant Faculties the determination of discipline. The .
   
• 
   
•   

Specific ����vlog���� policies on student organizations, including event planning and use of ����vlog���� campus space, can be found on the , beginning with the section.

Achieving Harvard Kennedy School’s mission requires an environment of trust, mutual respect, professionalism, and a commitment to truth, learning, and freedom of expression.

The Harvard Kennedy School community has agreed upon the following principles to accomplish this mission:

1. Respect for all members of our community and for the space we share.
2. Professional excellence and intellectual and academic rigor and integrity.
3. A disciplined learning environment, respecting different opinions and cultures and contributing to the understanding of all.
4. Accountability for actions inconsistent with this Code of Conduct.

It is the expectation of the School that all students, whether or not they are on campus or are currently enrolled as a degree candidate, will behave in a mature and responsible manner. This includes taking accountability for one’s own well-being, including responsible decision-making regarding physical and mental health. Further, the School expects every student to be familiar with the regulations governing membership in the Harvard and ����vlog���� community as set forth in the student handbook. Because students are expected to show good judgment and use common sense at all times, not all kinds of misconduct or behavioral standards are codified here. Students are expected to comply with all disciplinary rules from matriculation until the conferring of their degree. A degree will not be granted to students who are not in good standing or have a disciplinary charge pending against them.

In addition to the behaviors described elsewhere in this Handbook, the following behaviors are examples of conduct that may be subject to disciplinary sanctions: cheating, plagiarism, forgery or other forms of academic dishonesty; furnishing false information to University officials; and disruption or obstruction of teaching, research or other University activities, including occupation of a University building. Any of the following behaviors are also grounds for disciplinary sanctions: physical violence or abuse (including without limitation sexual assault); verbal abuse, harassment, coercion or other conduct that threatens the health or safety of any person or persons; theft of or damage to property; violation of published University rules or federal, state, or local law on University premises or at University sponsored activities; and misuse or abuse of library or computer facilities (Note that allegations of sexual and gender-based harassment, including sexual assault, initially are subject to specific procedures under Harvard’s University-wide policy, as adopted by ����vlog����; likewise, allegations of discrimination and bullying also are subject to specific procedures under Harvard’s University-wide policy, as adopted by ����vlog����).
 

Expectations During Virtual Operations 

During any times in which ����vlog���� conducts its operations virtually, including hosting courses, events, meetings and activities online, all of the policies, regulations and rules articulated in this Handbook apply. When students are communicating, collaborating, and connecting with one another—and with faculty, staff, alumni, and affiliates—virtually, they must do so in a manner that is consistent with the School’s values. Maintaining professional and respectful behavior in any ����vlog���� online environment is critical to ensuring that all students are able to fully participate in the learning experience and opportunities, and to achieve their educational goals. Whether participating in courses, community events, or other online forums (including but not limited to platforms like ����vlog���� Hub and Canvas), all students are expected to adhere to the Code of Conduct outlined herein. Any violations of the Code of Conduct may result in disciplinary action by ����vlog����.

Harvard Kennedy School has a commitment and obligation to produce graduates who are ethical professionals. Integral to this training is the value of academic honesty. High standards reflect the School’s academic integrity, foster a respectful environment for work and study, and provide an example of academic excellence for others. The Harvard Kennedy School Academic Code is an integral part of the ����vlog���� Code of Conduct.
 

Principles of the ����vlog���� Academic Code

All students must be committed to:

1. Doing their own work.
2. Citing ideas and words that are not their own in all assignments, e.g., any fact, phrase, or sentence from any source, including, for example, the Internet.
3. Strictly following collaboration guidelines as set forth by instructors for each assignment.
4. Not doing another student’s work or providing answers to another student.

All faculty members are committed to clarity for all work products with regard to:

1. Collaboration guidelines.
2. Requirements for citation in all written work.
3. Not changing assignments (numbers or due dates) previously stated in the course syllabus.
    

Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism

Members of the ����vlog���� community commit themselves to producing work that adheres to the scholarly and intellectual standards of accurate attribution of sources, appropriate collection and use of data, and transparent acknowledgement of the contribution of others to our ideas, discoveries, interpretations, and conclusions. Cheating on assignments or exams, plagiarizing or misrepresenting the ideas or language of someone else as one’s own, falsifying data, or any other instance of academic dishonesty violates the standards of our community, as well as the standards of the wider world of learning and affairs. Using someone else’s words or concepts without attribution is a serious violation of the Academic Code. It is the student’s responsibility to learn and use the proper forms of citation. If students submit work either not their own or without clear attribution to the original source, including but not limited to the Internet, they will be subject to discipline by the ����vlog���� Administrative Board, ranging from a warning to required withdrawal or expulsion from Harvard Kennedy School.

It is expected that all work product submitted at ����vlog����, including drafts of papers, presentations and memos, must be researched and written by the student whose name appears on the document. Students may obtain feedback from faculty members, course assistant/teaching fellows (CA/TFs), and/or preceptors, who may give students direction for improving their writing and, using examples from the work itself, specifics for revisions, but students should not expect instructors to provide extensive editing or to correct errors.

Students may solicit feedback from classmates only in the form of asking for general responses to the ideas expressed and/or the clarity of presentation. Classmates may make general suggestions about how to improve the assignment, but must not make specific revisions or corrections.

It is not acceptable for students to ask someone, either paid or unpaid, to:

1. Rewrite an assignment.
2. Extensively edit or correct a written assignment to improve either the contents or the presentation.
3. Translate any part of a written assignment.

It is the expectation of every course that all work submitted will have been done solely for that course. If the same or similar work is submitted to any other course, the prior written permission of all instructors involved must be obtained. Submitting work used professionally or for another school also requires prior written permission from the ����vlog���� instructor. Failure to adhere to these rules is a violation of the Academic Code.
 

Collaborative Work

Harvard Kennedy School students must also recognize the ethical obligations that arise out of collaborative work assignments in some ����vlog���� courses. Work of this sort is frequently an integral part of the teaching process; the School expects students to further the learning and competence of their colleagues. Students should be careful to meet the conditions specified in a collaborative assignment.

Permission to collaborate on one assignment does not mean collaboration is permitted on any other assignment. If students are uncertain about those conditions, they should obtain clarification from the instructor. When collaboration is permitted within a course students must acknowledge any collaboration and its extent in all submitted work. Failure to comply carries an academic penalty and may result in disciplinary action against the students involved. If at any time students have a question about these procedures, they should consult their instructor or program director.
 

����vlog���� Policy on Student Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Coursework 

Generative AI will likely influence the way you work in your future careers. We encourage you to spend some of your time at ����vlog���� learning to use this powerful new tool to work more productively and learn more effectively.

For your academic work at ����vlog����, generative AI can help you learn but it can also hinder your development. You could use this technology to complete class assignments while doing little work yourself, but doing so would rob you of the learning experiences you came to ����vlog���� for. Working through the course assignments will help you develop your thinking and skills, a key goal of an ����vlog���� education. At its best, generative AI can be like an instructor with unlimited time to work with you one-on-one. This virtual instructor should be used to help you learn but not to do the work for you. The three guidelines below are designed to help you use generative AI to get the most out of your ����vlog���� experience.

1. It is generally acceptable to use generative AI for finding information and for solidifying your knowledge of the course content. For instance, it is fine to use AI-powered web search and to have “conversations” with tools like ChatGPT to help you explore ideas, refine your thinking, identify examples, and better understand the course material. However, unless otherwise specified, it is a violation of the ����vlog���� Academic Code to incorporate into your coursework text produced predominantly by generative AI—similar to copying from a book or article. For example, it would be inappropriate to simply rewrite a draft generated by AI.
2. Generative AI can produce false or misleading information. You are ultimately responsible for the accuracy of any work you submit.
3. Given the range of learning goals at ����vlog����, individual instructors may create course-specific policies that differ from these general guidelines. If you have any doubt about whether a specific use of generative AI is permitted for an assignment or course, you should discuss it with your instructor prior to using it.

It’s hard to codify how best to use generative AI to help you learn. These tools are changing rapidly, and we anticipate this policy will evolve alongside advancements in AI, with feedback from students and instructors.
 

Timing of Academic Misconduct

If an allegation of academic dishonesty arises after a student has received a degree, the case will be referred to the ����vlog���� Administrative Board. A finding of academic dishonesty in such a case may result in rescission of the degree.

Harvard Kennedy School is committed to advancing the public interest by training enlightened leaders and solving public problems through world-class scholarship and active engagement with practitioners and decision makers. This commitment, we believe, includes teaching our students to lead effectively across lines of difference.

Our faculty, students, and staff are exposed to and learn to understand a broad array of ideas, insights, and cultures. Gaining this exposure involves attracting outstanding people from diverse backgrounds and traditions. The Kennedy School does not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, creed, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, marital or parental status, disability, source of income, or status as a veteran in admission to, access to, treatment in, or employment in its programs and activities.

The Kennedy School actively pursues the expansion and maintenance of an atmosphere that welcomes new ideas—even unpopular and controversial ones—and encourages an effective and active exchange of views in an environment of mutual respect.

Harvard Kennedy School is committed to recruiting a highly diverse group of faculty, students, and staff. We work to ensure that our appointments and selection procedures consciously identify and evaluate people from underrepresented groups. We also actively strive to remove sources of unconscious bias.

The Kennedy School’s curriculum deals with issues of diversity and encourages students and faculty to talk openly and effectively about difficult and highly charged issues. The School provides professional support to faculty as to how to teach these issues effectively. We emphasize the powerful benefit of the exchange of ideas. The School enlists students in efforts to make classrooms and classmates more welcoming of the ideas and insights that students from different backgrounds and perspectives offer. And we seek to correct situations where full and open exchange of ideas has been limited.

One of Harvard Kennedy School’s greatest assets is its breadth of talent in the community. The School is consistently working toward increasing that diversity further and taking full advantage of the opportunities for training enlightened leaders and solving critical public problems.

You are expected to uphold additional standards of conduct as a member of the Harvard Kennedy School and Harvard University communities. These standards are in place to help ensure the academic vibrancy of ����vlog����, your safety during your time at Harvard, the protection of data and resources, and the enforcement of laws and policies. By adhering to these important standards, you play a crucial role in creating a community where all can learn and flourish.

The ����vlog���� Non-Attribution Rule

All ����vlog���� events are, unless otherwise explicitly stated, not for attribution. This means you can share in a general way what you learned, but not who said what, without expressed permission. We follow this rule to maintain a culture of mutual respect and trust within our community, and to ensure that we can learn from candid discussion about a wide range of perspectives and experiences.

The non-attribution rule does not supersede the university’s Title IX, Non-Discrimination, and Anti-Bullying Policies. If you have a concern about a potential policy violation, please share your concern with the appropriate official at the Kennedy School.

Use of Personal Technology in Classrooms

����vlog���� discourages the use of technology for personal purposes during classes, seminars, or other professional events. We do this to minimize distractions that might interfere with learning, to maintain a culture of mutual respect and trust within our community, and to ensure that we can learn from candid discussion about a wide range of perspectives and experiences. Repeated uses of technology for unauthorized purposes in the classroom may result in a reduction of your grade. If you require an accommodation related to technology, please contact the Disability Accommodations Coordinator. And if you need an exception to these rules due to a family emergency or acute care responsibilities, please talk to your instructor.

Open Debate, Protest, and Dissent at ����vlog����

The members of the ����vlog���� community—students, faculty, staff, and fellows—are here because of our commitment to making the world a better place. We care deeply, observe scrupulously, analyze rigorously, and converse passionately about public policy. That is what we do here. The desire to share with each other the conclusions we reach is the most natural thing in the world. 

We are diverse, however, in which of the planet’s myriad problems and opportunities we prioritize. And we often come to different conclusions about what “better” means for a particular policy issue. Making our rich diversity a strength rather than a struggle is a prime imperative for the Kennedy School. This imperative motivates our efforts to promote candid and constructive conversations in general and underscores the importance of well-considered rules about public protest and other forms of organized dissent.

It is normal for each of us to consider our own views to be both righteous and urgent. This can tempt us to neglect others’ rights to decide not to listen, whether because they disagree or because they have other priorities for their time and attention. Those of us who find ����vlog���� rules too constraining might reflect on their own willingness to tolerate insistent exposure to unwelcome messages. And those of us who wish the School went further in regulating protests might consider the intensity and sincerity of community members’ hunger to share their deepest convictions.  

The core principle behind our debate, protest and dissent policy is that each of us has the right to solicit the community’s attention to our viewpoint, but not to compel, force, or monopolize it. Depriving others of the right to decide which public issues to think about, how to think about them, and where and when to express opinions about them violates foundational ����vlog���� values of rigorous and open inquiry. And we need to recognize that acts of deprivation include not just direct actions by students and other members of the ����vlog���� community but also any actions that enable individuals from the ����vlog���� community, other schools at Harvard, or outside Harvard to engage in stifling and disruptive protest inside the Kennedy School.

To foster an environment of open and civil discussion, the following guidelines frame the expectations for members of the ����vlog���� community during events, meetings, and other occasions apart from class sessions when speakers present their views—on the ����vlog���� campus or elsewhere at Harvard University. For additional information, please see the ����vlog���� student Code of Conduct and the University’s . 

PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES

Upholding the right to invite but not to compel attention underpins all our policies on protest and dissent, but manifests in different ways for different settings. 

We honor demonstrations, tabling, and other ways of asserting our convictions in the following ����vlog���� spaces: 

This is part of what makes ����vlog���� so vibrant. Each of us is free to engage with a protest or to move on to reflect, study, or converse about other things we care about. Some constraints include prohibitions against blocking paths, walkways, hallways, and doorways; the artificial amplification of voices or recorded media that impedes normal discourse in public spaces; and the building of structures or other means of maintaining a physical presence in public spaces overnight. And as with any event, .

Much of intellectual life at the Kennedy School takes place in what we might consider private spaces within the School, including offices, carrels, cubicles, and common workspaces. No form of demonstration should occur in these private venues.

PUBLIC EVENTS

Learning Spaces, Including Study Groups, and Student Organization Gatherings

We are not just a community of people concerned about public life, but also a school. Students come here to learn facts, tools, and concepts that empower them to put their values to work in the world. They take courses that they choose or that are components of degree programs that they choose. Protecting students’ right to learn during class time, discussions that extend from class, seminars, study groups, and study time is why our limits on disruptive protest are tightest surrounding the classroom, seminars, study and private meeting spaces, and libraries. 

Public demonstration and organized dissent that may reasonably occur in outdoor spaces have no place in the classroom, seminar rooms, meeting spaces, or in libraries. And whereas non-disruptive group displays of dissent (e.g., collective use of signs, symbolic clothing, gesturing in civil ways, standing) may have a legitimate role in public events, they are antithetical to learning when they occur in a place or manner that deprives students of voice, compels their attention to a specific viewpoint, or otherwise violates the spirit of open academic discourse and reflection on which learning is based. During class-related activities, ����vlog���� instructors are the guarantors of the student right to learn regardless of students’ individual viewpoints, which gives instructors both the authority and the responsibility to maintain the appropriate educational environment of learning spaces. Similarly, Kennedy School librarians have such authority and responsibility regarding library spaces. In faculty- or staff-led seminars or study groups, center staff have such authority and responsibility. In student-led meetings or study groups, student organizers of the event have the authority and responsibility consistent with these guidelines. 

INFORMATION

It is natural that discussions of the vital issues of the day will extend beyond public events and related activities at ����vlog����. Such discussions are an essential part of the academic experience and how we individually and collectively seek to enrich debates about public policy and to express our dissent. Whether these discussions take place on social media or in other public fora, we have obligations to each other in how they are conducted. Just as activities inside the classroom are protected by the ����vlog���� Non-Attribution Rule (we are free to use the information received but not to attribute the source of this information to a specific individual or group), discussions at ����vlog���� that occur outside the classroom should be governed by the same concept of not personally attributing a point of view to a speaker without consent. The University non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies also apply to social media and non-classroom discussions related to ����vlog���� activities. 

FORCE OR VIOLENCE

Using or threatening force or violence—interfering with the freedom of movement of a speaker or a member of an audience or assaulting a speaker or member of the audience—is never permitted.

Consequences

Any violations of these guidelines by ����vlog���� students would represent violations of the student Code of Conduct and Harvard’s , and the violators would be subject to appropriate disciplinary action. Any violations of the guidelines by ����vlog���� staff, faculty, fellows, speakers, or other audience members would also be grounds for appropriate disciplinary or other action. 
 

Firearms, Explosives, Combustible Fuels, Firecrackers, and Dangerous Weapons

Possession and/or use on University property of firearms or other dangerous weapons (as defined below) or ammunition, explosives, combustible fuels, firecrackers, and potential ingredients thereof are forbidden by University policy.

The applicable Massachusetts law is as follows:

For the purpose of this paragraph “firearm” shall mean any pistol, revolver, rifle or smoothbore arm from which a shot, bullet or pellet can be discharged.

Whoever, not being a law enforcement officer, and notwithstanding any license obtained by the person pursuant to chapter 140, carries on the person a firearm, loaded or unloaded, or other dangerous weapon in any building or on the grounds of any elementary or secondary school, college or university without the written authorization of the board or officer in charge of such elementary or secondary school, college or university shall be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years or both. A law enforcement officer may arrest without a warrant and detain a person found carrying a firearm in violation of this paragraph.

Any officer in charge of an elementary or secondary school, college or university, or any faculty member or administrative officer of an elementary or secondary school, college or university that fails to report violations of this paragraph shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars.

Massachusetts General Laws, c. 269 § 10(j).

Under Massachusetts law, the definition of dangerous weapons includes many items designed to do bodily injury:

… any stiletto, dagger or a device or case which enables a knife with a locking blade to be drawn at a locked position, any ballistic knife, or any knife with a detachable blade capable of being propelled by any mechanism, dirk knife, any knife having a double-edged blade, or a switch knife, or any knife having an automatic spring release device by which the blade is released from the handle, having a blade of over one and one-half inches, or a slung shot, blowgun, blackjack, metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles, nunchaku, zoobow, also known as klackers or kung fu sticks, or any similar weapon consisting of two sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather, a shuriken or any similar pointed starlike object intended to injure a person when thrown, or any armband, made with leather which has metallic spikes, points or studs or any similar device made from any other substance or a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand, or a Manriki-Gusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends …

Massachusetts General Laws, c. 269 § 10(b).

Students should recognize that even when they are away from the University, Massachusetts law requires a permit or firearms identification card or compliance with other specialized rules (depending upon the type of weapon) for possession of any firearms.

The definition of firearms is broad, and includes pistols or guns operated by air, carbon dioxide, or other gases. Carrying any firearm (even if unloaded) in violation of the law is punishable by imprisonment with a mandatory minimum sentence of eighteen months, which cannot be suspended or reduced.

Massachusetts General Laws, c. 269 § 10(a).

Students should consult the local police department in the city or town in which they reside if they intend to possess firearms on non-University property, in order to assure strict compliance with the applicable statutes.

Threats Involving Deadly Weapons, Explosives, Bombs, Chemical or Biological Agents, or Other Deadly Devices or Substance

The following provision of Massachusetts law concerning certain kinds of threats underscores why such behavior must be treated by ����vlog���� as an actionable offense:

Whoever willfully communicates or causes to be communicated, either directly or indirectly, orally, in writing, by mail, by use of a telephone or telecommunication device including, but not limited to, electronic mail, Internet communications and facsimile communications, through an electronic communication device or by any other means, a threat: (1) that a firearm, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or assault weapon, as defined in section 121 of chapter 140, an explosive or incendiary device, a dangerous chemical or biological agent, a poison, a harmful radioactive substance or any other device, substance or item capable of causing death, serious bodily injury or substantial property damage, will be used at a place or location, or is present or will be present at a place or location, whether or not the same is in fact used or present; or (2) to hijack an aircraft, ship, or common carrier thereby causing anxiety, unrest, fear, or personal discomfort to any person or group of persons shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 20 years or imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 2 1/2 years, or by fine of not more than $10,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Whoever willfully communicates or causes to be communicated such a threat thereby causing either the evacuation or serious disruption of a school, school related event, school transportation, or a dwelling, building, place of assembly, facility or public transport, or an aircraft, ship or common carrier, or willfully communicates or causes serious public inconvenience or alarm, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than 3 years nor more than 20 years or imprisonment in the house of correction for not less than 6 months nor more than 2 1/2 years, or by fine of not less than $1,000 nor more than $50,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Massachusetts General Laws, c. 269 § 14(b)-(c).
 

Drugs and Alcohol

The unlawful possession, use or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students and employees on Harvard property or as part of any Harvard activities are violations of University rules as well as the law. Possession, use or distribution of certain nonprescription drugs, including marijuana, amphetamines, heroin, cocaine, and nonprescription synthetics; procurement or distribution of alcohol if anyone is under 21 years of age; and provision of alcohol to anyone under 21 years of age are violations of the law and Harvard policy. Although Massachusetts law now permits adults aged 21 or older to possess and consume marijuana under certain circumstances, federal law prohibits the possession, use or distribution of marijuana, including for medical purposes, on Harvard property or as part of a Harvard activity. Thus, even if possession of use of marijuana would be permitted under Massachusetts law, it remains prohibited on campus. Additionally, the misuse of prescription drugs (sharing, buying or using in a manner different than that prescribed) is a violation of University policy.

The University holds its students and employees responsible for the consequences of their decisions to use or distribute illicit drugs, or to serve or consume alcohol. Further, it expects students and employees to create and maintain an environment for learning and working that is safe and healthy and encourages responsible conduct. Refer to the Office of Campus Planning and Operations for information on ����vlog����’ smoke-free and tobacco-free campus policy. The use of illicit drugs and the misuse of alcohol are potentially harmful to health. Because of the considerable health hazards involved in drug and alcohol use, administrative, medical and psychiatric services for students having drug problems or difficulty controlling their use of alcohol are available on a confidential basis from the Harvard University Health Services (HUHS). Any member of the University may make use of HUHS on an emergency basis, day or night.

Harvard University is not, and cannot be considered a sanctuary from the existing laws of the city, state or federal government. Students are reminded that there are heavy penalties, including imprisonment, for possession or distribution of illicit drugs and for selling or delivering alcohol to, or procuring alcohol for, someone under 21. There are also serious penalties for anyone caught falsifying a driver’s license, selling or distributing false IDs; and anyone, regardless of age, who operates a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs or with an open container of alcohol. There may be additional rules and guidelines concerning alcohol at ����vlog���� student events. Refer to the  for information on alcohol policy for events supported by ����vlog����.

State and local laws and regulations prohibit consumption of alcohol on public property or on property open to the public. The School may take disciplinary action when cases of this type come to its attention. While the School initially may respond to the use of illicit drugs, serving of alcohol to underage individuals, and over-consumption of alcohol with a warning and/or referral to health or counseling services, students should understand that violations of the School’s policies set forth above, including without limitation a pattern of behavior in violation of these rules may lead to disciplinary action by the Administrative Board ranging from admonition up to and including expulsion. The Administrative Board will take serious disciplinary actions in any case involving the possession in quantity or the sale or distribution of drugs, or when cases of drug and alcohol use involve danger to individuals or to the community at large.

Additional information about alcohol and other drug policies can be found in  issued by the Harvard University Police Department, and incorporated here by reference.

Hazing and Harassment

����vlog���� Policy on Hazing

Students are advised that Massachusetts law expressly prohibits any form of hazing in connection with the initiation of students into student groups and organizations. The relevant statutes are provided below. The law applies to both officially recognized and unrecognized student groups and to practices conducted on and off campus.

Using the definition of hazing set forth in the Massachusetts hazing statute, the Administrative Board will consider all reports of hazing in the normal course of its oversight, taking disciplinary action in appropriate cases, and will report confirmed incidents to appropriate law enforcement officials. If students are found responsible for hazing, they will be subject to disciplinary action by the Administrative Board ranging from admonition up to and including expulsion.

The Massachusetts hazing statute (M.G.L. Chapter 269) states the following:

Section 17: Whoever is a principal organizer or participant in the crime of hazing, as defined herein, shall be punished by a fine of not more than three thousand dollars or by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than one year, or both such fine and imprisonment.

The term “hazing” as used in this section and in sections eighteen and nineteen, shall mean any conduct or method of initiation into any student organization, whether on public or private property, which willfully or recklessly endangers the physical or mental health of any student or other person. Such conduct shall include whipping, beating, branding, forced calisthenics, exposure to the weather, forced consumption of any food, liquor, beverage, drug or other substance, or any other brutal treatment or forced physical activity which is likely to adversely affect the physical health or safety of any such student or other person, or which subjects such student or other person to extreme mental stress, including extended deprivation of sleep or rest or extended isolation.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section to the contrary, consent shall not be available as a defense to any prosecution under this action.

Section 18: Whoever knows that another person is the victim of hazing as defined in section seventeen and is at the scene of such crime shall, to the extent that such person can do so without danger or peril to himself or others, report such crime to an appropriate law enforcement official as soon as reasonably practicable. Whoever fails to report such crime shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars.

Section 19: Each institution of secondary education and each public and private institution of post-secondary education shall issue to every student group, student team or student organization which is part of such institution or is recognized by the institution or permitted by the institution to use its name or facilities or is known by the institution to exist as an unaffiliated student group, student team or student organization, a copy of this section and sections seventeen and eighteen; provided, however, that an institution’s compliance with this section’s requirements that an institution issue copies of this section and sections seventeen and eighteen to unaffiliated student groups, teams or organizations shall not constitute evidence of the institution’s recognition or endorsement of said unaffiliated student groups, teams or organizations.

Each such group, team or organization shall distribute a copy of this section and sections seventeen and eighteen to each of its members, plebes, pledges or applicants for membership. It shall be the duty of each such group, team or organization, acting through its designated officer, to deliver annually, to the institution an attested acknowledgement stating that such group, team or organization has received a copy of this section and said sections seventeen and eighteen, that each of its members, plebes, pledges, or applicants has received a copy of sections seventeen and eighteen, and that such group, team or organization understands and agrees to comply with the provisions of this section and sections seventeen and eighteen.

Each institution of secondary education and each public or private institution of post-secondary education shall, at least annually, before or at the start of enrollment, deliver to each person who enrolls as a full-time student in such institution a copy of this section and sections seventeen and eighteen.

Each institution of secondary education and each public or private institution of post-secondary education shall file, at least annually, a report with the board of higher education and in the case of secondary institutions, the board of education, certifying that such institution has complied with its responsibility to inform student groups, teams or organizations and to notify each full time student enrolled by it of the provisions of this section and sections seventeen and eighteen and also certifying that said institution has adopted a disciplinary policy with regard to the organizers and participants of hazing, and that such policy has been set forth with appropriate emphasis in the student handbook or similar means of communicating the institution’s policies to its students. The board of higher education and, in the case of secondary institutions, the board of education shall promulgate regulations governing the content and frequency of such reports, and shall forthwith report to the attorney general any such institution which fails to make such report.
 

Harvard University Non-Discrimination and Anti-Bullying Policies

The University has adopted new policies and procedures to address discrimination and bullying. These policies apply to all students, faculty, staff, researchers and other members of the Harvard community across all Schools and units, including Harvard Kennedy School. The University’s non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies can be found here.

Whenever a formal complaint of discrimination or bullying is investigated in accordance with the University’s non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies and procedures, and those procedures result in a finding that a policy violation has occurred, then sanctions or remedial measures will be determined by Harvard Kennedy School's Appropriate Official or designee(s), as set forth in those procedures. The ����vlog���� Appropriate Official or designee(s) must accept the finding of a policy violation as final and non-reviewable. The only opportunity to appeal the determination of a policy violation is provided within the University’s non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies and procedures. Decisions about sanctions and remedial measures are final and cannot be appealed.

The following Local Designated Resources in ����vlog���� serve as a resource for receiving reports and complaints, directing community members to resources, and providing information on supportive measures:

• Cailin Burke is the Lead Local Designated Coordinator 

There are other “Affiliate LDRs” who can also discuss concerns with you and share resources. They are:

• Bobby Croke (students)
• (students)
• (faculty)
• (staff)
• (fellows)
• Robbin Chapman (anyone)
• (anyone)
• Amy Davies (anyone)

At ����vlog����, the following individuals have been designated as Appropriate Officials, who serve as the final authority to issue any sanctions under the University’s non-discrimination and anti-bullying policies:

• For situations involving faculty, the Appropriate Official is the Academic Dean
• For situations involving students, the Appropriate Official is the Administrative Board
• For situations involving staff members, the Appropriate Official is the Chief Human Resources Officer

Dean Jeremy Weinstein also has authority to issue final sanctions, except for any decided by the Administrative Board.
 

����vlog���� Policies Addressing Title IX Sexual Harassment and Other Sexual Misconduct

Harvard Kennedy School has adopted the University-wide Interim Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy and Interim Other Sexual Misconduct Policy.  In addition, the University’s Sexual and Gender Based Harassment policy addresses sexual harassment and other sexual misconduct alleged to have occurred between September 1, 2014 and August 14, 2020. .

In all such cases, the  and Harvard University's are responsible for implementing the University’s grievance procedures, which will determine whether a student committed a policy violation. Whenever a formal complaint of sexual harassment or other sexual misconduct is investigated and the University’s grievance procedures result in a finding that a policy violation has occurred, the ����vlog���� Administrative Board (Ad Board) must accept that finding as final and non-reviewable. The only opportunity to appeal the determination of a policy violation is provided within the grievance procedures implemented by the ODR and the Office for Gender Equity. Appeals within ����vlog���� pertain only to the decision of the ����vlog���� Administrative Board (Ad Board) in determining discipline.
 

Resources

UNIVERSITY RESOURCES

LOCAL TITLE IX COORDINATORS

• (students)
• Sarah Olia (students)
•  (faculty)
• (staff)
•  (at large)
•  (at large)
•  (at large)

UNIVERSITY SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICIES & PROCEDURES

• University Title IX Coordinator: Nicole Merhill

OUTSIDE AGENCIES

Admissions Materials

Harvard Kennedy School does not knowingly provide false information or “cover” for any member of our community who is from an intelligence agency. It is against Kennedy School policies for members of our community to carry out intelligence operations at Harvard Kennedy School. To do so would be contrary to our mission and values.

Occasionally, candidates for admission will make inaccurate or incomplete statements or submit false material in connection with their applications to ����vlog����. In most cases, these misrepresentations or omissions are discovered during the admission process and the application is rejected. If a misrepresentation or omission is discovered after a student is admitted, the offer of admission ordinarily will be withdrawn.  If a misrepresentation or omission is discovered after a student has registered, or registered and completed courses, the offer of admission ordinarily will be rescinded, the course credit and grades will be revoked, and the student will be required to leave the School. If the discovery occurs after a degree has been awarded, the offer of admission ordinarily will be rescinded, and the course credit, grades, and degree will be revoked. The determination that an application is inaccurate, incomplete, or contains misrepresentations or omissions rests with the Office of Admissions, which has the authority to resolve the matter outside the student disciplinary process.  The Office of Admissions also may rescind an offer of admission in other circumstances, including without limitation if: there is a discrepancy between the transcripts originally provided as part of the application and the official versions (or translations) submitted after acceptance; the admitted candidate did not satisfactorily complete any courses and degree programs in progress at the time of application; or the admitted candidate has engaged in academic or personal conduct that calls into question their honesty, maturity, or moral character or is otherwise inconsistent with the School’s expectations for conduct.  
 

Use of Harvard Data

As members of the ����vlog���� and Harvard communities, students may be asked to assist with faculty research, to serve on committees, or to be involved with other School and University groups who use Harvard data to inform their work. Students are required to respect the private nature of any such data and must abide by all . Students may access and use of Harvard data only for the sole purpose intended. Misappropriation, misuse, or unauthorized use ordinarily will result in disciplinary action.
 

Copyright Laws

Federal law prohibits the reproduction, distribution, public display, or public performance of copyrighted materials, or the preparation of derivative works based on such copyrighted materials, without permission of the copyright holder, except in accordance with fair use or other specifically applicable statutory exceptions.

Read  about  the Digital  Millennium Copyright  Act.
 

Use of Harvard Resources

Membership in the University affords students access to a wide array of resources, including, for example, one of the world’s greatest libraries, extensive computing and network facilities, laboratories, and works of art and architecture of immeasurable value. Access to these resources makes time at Harvard a special privilege; students have rights and responsibilities regarding their use.

To safeguard the integrity of such resources, the University relies on its students to use them with care, appropriately, and as authorized; to respect the rights of others who also have access; and to observe the rules granting access to, and use of, those resources. Harvard and its resources are not to be used by individuals for personal financial gain. Students may not use University or School resources (facilities, personnel, or equipment) to support individual businesses or other outside activities or third-party organizations without authorization, or for any other purposes that are unrelated to the education, research, scholarship, and public service missions of the University. Students may not sell lecture or reading notes, papers, or translations from ����vlog���� classes. Failure to abide by the rules governing the use of Harvard resources ordinarily will result in disciplinary action.

Use of Harvard Name

The University’s Policy on the Use of the Harvard Name and Insignias provides that students may use the Harvard name (alone or in conjunction with the name of a specific school or unit) or any Harvard or School logo or insignia (including shields and other official graphics) only with the approval of their Dean or the Provost, except as follows: students are generally permitted to identify themselves in publications or other public activities with an accurate, specific affiliation (e.g. “John Doe MPP candidate, Harvard Kennedy School”) so long as this is done in a manner that makes clear they are students and does not imply University endorsement or responsibility for any particular activity, product or publication involved.

Students may not permit any third party to use the Harvard names or trademarks without authorization from the . Students also need permission to use the Harvard or ����vlog���� logo or insignia in any manner.

Any student group that uses the Harvard Kennedy School name must identify itself in all publications and materials as a student organization. For example, on letterhead, posters, other written materials, websites, online notices, etc., the name or web banner, etc. should say “����vlog���� Water Caucus, a student organization at Harvard Kennedy School.” All Harvard student group names incorporating any of the University’s trademarks are owned by President and Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard University) and are used by permission of the University. In addition, the use of any of Harvard’s shields/logos by student groups is by permission of the University. Any use of Harvard’s names/logos by student groups or students must comply with all relevant University policies, including the policy on the .

The School expects that if students use social media platforms in their individual capacity (for example, blogs, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Storify, among many others) with an individual account that reflects their affiliation as Harvard or Harvard Kennedy School students, they will accurately identify their status as a student and make clear that their opinions are their own and do not represent an institutional view. For instance, a blog’s “about the author” page or a Twitter account’s description may contain language like “Student at Harvard Kennedy School.”

Before posting students should think carefully about the impact their public posts could have on fellow members of the Harvard and/or Harvard Kennedy School community.

Students are expected to comply with all disciplinary rules from matriculation until the conferring of the degree. A degree will not be granted to a student who is not in good standing or has a disciplinary charge pending. After a case is brought to the attention of the designated ����vlog���� disciplinary officer, they will consult with the faculty member(s) or other person(s) presenting the case and with the student(s) involved and will collect written statements and supporting documentation from all parties. The ����vlog���� disciplinary process is available to students who feel the Code of Conduct has been violated by a student or students. Disciplinary cases ordinarily are considered by the Administrative Board (Ad Board)—a body appointed by the Dean and composed of ����vlog���� faculty members and administrators—as quickly as is reasonably possible, given the Board’s schedule and the need to investigate matters carefully. Note that the Ad Board does not meet during the summer months.
 

Procedures for Cases not Involving Allegations of Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment 

If, upon review by the disciplinary officer and the chair of the Ad Board (or their designee), there is inadequate evidence to suggest an infraction of the ����vlog���� rules to justify review by the Ad Board, then the case will not advance.

If, upon review by the disciplinary officer and the Ad Board chair (or their designee), there is adequate evidence to suggest an infraction, they will schedule a meeting of the Ad Board.

When it convenes, the Board will review all relevant materials and arrive at a conclusion as to whether there has been an infraction of the ����vlog���� rules and, if so, taking into account Board precedent and any mitigating circumstances, what disciplinary action is warranted. The range of actions the Ad Board may take is outlined in the section labelled “sanctions” in this handbook. All decisions require a vote of at least 2/3 of the Ad Board members present at the meeting (provided there is a quorum).
 

Procedures for Cases Involving Allegations of Sexual and Gender-Based Harassment 

Harvard Kennedy School has adopted the University-wide Interim Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy and Interim Other Sexual Misconduct Policy. In addition, the University’s Sexual and Gender Based Harassment policy addresses sexual harassment and other sexual misconduct alleged to have occurred between September 1, 2014 and August 14, 2020. .  In all such cases, the and the are responsible for implementing the University’s grievance procedures, which will determine whether a student committed a policy violation.

When the School receives an allegation of sexual or gender-based harassment against a student, either directly or upon notification from ODR, the senior associate dean for Degree Programs and Student Affairs or the assistant dean for student services and programs will meet with the student respondent to explain, among other things, the disciplinary process that may take place following the issuance of ODR’s final report, and the range of disciplinary sanctions.

When the alleged conduct is found to violate the University Policy, the School’s Ad Board will consider the imposition of appropriate sanctions, as described below.

Regardless of whether the alleged conduct has been found to violate the University Policy, the Ad Board also will consider whether it violates other ����vlog���� rules and expectations for behavior. If so, the Ad Board will handle the case in accordance with its ordinary policies and procedures, as set forth above.

All members of the Ad Board will receive appropriate training in the handling and resolution of allegations of sexual and gender-based harassment. The respondent and complainant will be notified when a violation of the University Policy is referred to the Ad Board for consideration of discipline. Within three days of this notification, the respondent and complainant may each submit a written statement to the Ad Board solely for the purpose of addressing what, if any, sanctions each feels is appropriate. Neither is required to do so. The statements may not challenge the validity of the findings of fact and conclusions contained in the final report, and also may not introduce facts that could have been presented to the investigator or that conflict with any of the findings in the final report. Whenever a formal complaint of sexual harassment or other sexual misconduct is investigated and the University’s grievance procedures result in a finding that a policy violation has occurred, the ����vlog���� Administrative Board (Ad Board) must accept that finding as final and non-reviewable. The only opportunity to appeal the determination of a policy violation is provided within the grievance procedures implemented by the ODR and the Office for Gender Equity. Appeals within ����vlog���� pertain only to the decision of the ����vlog���� Administrative Board (Ad Board) in determining discipline.
 

Sanctions

After review of the facts and circumstances in any case of misconduct, the Ad Board may take the following actions:

• Charge dismissed
   
• Admonition: a formal rebuke to a student whose behavior violates the rules or standards of conduct of the community. An admonition does not become part of the student’s official record.
   
• Reprimand: a formal rebuke to a student whose behavior violates the rules or standards of conduct of the community. A reprimand becomes a permanent part of the student’s official record.
   
• Probation: a strong warning to a student whose conduct gives serious cause for concern. Probation is a formal disciplinary action and becomes part of the student’s official record. No student on probation may be recommended for a degree. Further, during the probation period, any further instance of misconduct will cause the Ad Board to seriously consider requiring the student to withdraw except in very unusual cases. The duration and terms of probation are set by the Ad Board.
   
• Requirement to withdraw: action taken in serious disciplinary cases indicating that a student’s behavior is unacceptable in the community. Requirement to withdraw is a formal disciplinary action and becomes part of the student’s official record. Requirement to withdraw is ordinarily effective immediately upon vote of the Ad Board. The student’s transcript will show a permanent notation that the student was required to withdraw. Students who have been required to withdraw may petition for readmission under terms stipulated by the Ad Board. If a student is required to withdraw for academic or disciplinary misconduct, all scholarship and grant assistance is forfeited, and assistance will not be renewed for subsequent periods of enrollment even if a student is allowed to re-enroll.
   
• Dismissal: action taken in serious disciplinary cases whereby a student’s connection with the University is ended by vote of the ����vlog���� faculty (the action taken by the Ad Board is a vote of requirement to withdraw with a recommendation to the faculty that the student be dismissed). Dismissal is effective upon a 2/3 vote of the faculty; a second 2/3 vote of both the Ad Board and the faculty is required in order for the student to return. If a student is dismissed for academic or disciplinary misconduct, all scholarship and grant assistance is forfeited, and assistance will not be renewed for subsequent periods of enrollment even if the student is allowed to re-enroll.
   
• Expulsion: the most extreme disciplinary action possible. It signifies the student is no longer welcome in the community. Expulsion must be voted by the ����vlog���� faculty (the action taken by the Ad Board is a vote of requirement to withdraw with a recommendation to the faculty that the student be expelled). Expulsion is effective upon a 2/3 vote of the faculty. A student who has been expelled may not be readmitted. If a student is expelled for academic or disciplinary misconduct, all scholarship and grant assistance is forfeited.